### Up To PAR###

PAR's Weblog

Check out the latest work/life news for lawyers at PAR's weblog, "Up to PAR." Commentary on news, alerts about trends, and discussion of personnel management practices are yours for the clicking.

Read more in the Up To PAR weblog archive.


Infobit: Since 1985, law schools have been graduating classes of new lawyers that are 40% or more female. Yet in 1996, only 14.2% of law firm partners were women, and in 2005, only 17.2% were women. (Note: this figure is for all partners; the number of equity partners is lower.) Source: Catalyst. At this rate of increase, women should make up half of law firm partners by the year 2115.

For past Infobits, check our the Infobit Archive.




Best Practice #10

Job Share

What is Job Sharing? Can law firms do it?

Job sharing is a work arrangement that allows two attorneys to share a single position. Corporate counsel and government attorneys are already successfully job sharing, and law firms have begun to try it out. According to the findings from the 2005 NALP Workplace Questionnaire, 1.6% of private law firms surveyed allow job-sharing and another 18.4% allow it on a case-by-case basis. In total, 127 law firms of 637 offices surveyed allow job-sharing on an affirmative or case-by-case basis.

In a job sharing arrangement, two attorneys share the responsibilities of one full-time position, each earning pro-rated salary and receiving full or pro-rated benefits. There are two basic job share models: the twins model and the islands model. Attorneys who use the twins model essentially share everything - clients, projects, and responsibilities - but work on different days of the week. This model requires a high level of communication between the attorneys, but provides the benefits of consistent client coverage, two heads thinking about a legal matter for the price of one, and coverage during vacation and other leave.

In contrast, the islands model requires little reliance on the job sharing partner, as both attorneys handle their own separate caseloads, in essentially two separate jobs. The islands model provides flexibility within a law department to cover different types of practice areas that may not justify a full-time attorney, and also can be structured to assure coverage during vacation.

Which model is used will depend largely on the type of practice and the specific client needs. Some clients may prefer to rely on one attorney only, even if that means not being able to interact with that attorney every day of the week. Other clients may prefer to work with two attorneys, knowing one of them is always available at the office.

Attorneys who job share report a high level of satisfaction. Unlike part-time attorneys, they are not bothered at home when a problem arises on their day off. The collaborative aspects of job sharing are also often appealing.

Job sharing is one reduced schedule solution that may be particularly effective in smaller law firms. Like many law departments, small law firms often have limited financial resources and workload pressures that limit the availability of part-time options. In these smaller, more intimate environments where a high level of communication among attorneys probably exists naturally, job sharing can provide a viable and cost-effective solution to the attorneys' needs for balance without compromising the workload needs and finances of the firm.

According to Linda Marks Director of Training and Consulting for the Center for WorkLife Law and co-author with Karyn Feiden of Negotiating time: New Scheduling Options in the Legal Profession, successful job sharing requires both a team that can work well together and a supportive employer. She emphasizes the essential three C's of a job sharing partner: compatibility, communication and cooperation. Marks also suggests that potential job sharers develop a written proposal so both attorneys can clarify their ideas about how the job will be shared and can present a clear and strong proposal to firm management.

There are few costs associated with job sharing, mainly benefits if both job share partners have full benefits and malpractice insurance. The benefits and savings attributable to job sharing can far outweigh the costs, however. Job sharing can greatly reduce the high costs of attrition, and that alone recoups any cost. In addition, reduced absenteeism and increased efficiency result when job sharers do not use their work time to attend to their personal affairs. In Negotiating Time, Marks provides a chart and full discussion of the cost analysis of job shared positions.

Can law firms do it? Absolutely.

Check out the real-world example of job sharing below. Do attorneys at your firm job share? Would attorneys at your firm like to? Let us know your experiences, thoughts, and questions by sending an email.


 

An in-house attorney:

When I asked to go part time, my boss suggested that I job share. She was concerned that the clients wouldn’t be covered on the day I wanted to take off, and also that I would have to do a full workload on a part-time schedule. I was concerned about relying on someone else to do some of my work, so I talked with other job sharers in our company. It was clear it was working for them, so I decided to give it a try. I had input into the final choice when my partner was hired. At first, my partner worked the same hours that I did and ‘shadowed’ me so she could learn the job and the corporate culture. Now, we each work a designated three days a week. If we need to revise the schedule for personal or work-related reasons, we do.

It is working really, really well. My partner and I have similar styles. We tend to give the same advice, and we have the same manner in working with clients. We both want the same thing: to do a good job, work well together, and go home. There is no competition, and I don’t have to worry that she wants to get ahead of me on the promotion track. Although we share most of our work, each of us on occasion is assigned to projects that we handle individually.

We keep each other informed about what is going on in the work we share. We copy each other on emails, and send an email summary at the end of the day. We talk on the phone as well. I don’t mind talking to my partner on my day off because I like her and we are a team. If a client starts a matter with me while I am in the office, I let him or her know that if the matter requires follow up on a day I am not scheduled to be in, my job share partner will handle it and I will have briefed her on the matter. We keep each other informed so the client is not in a position of having to repeat information he or she already gave to one of us.

We change our outgoing voicemail and email messages to reflect our schedules, and we tell clients to email both of us and that whoever is in the office will respond. The clients feel we are interchangeable and very responsive — they often forget which of us they talked to because we are so similar.
They also like it because we respond so quickly to them and no one is left hanging.

A job sharing twins model attorney


More information on job sharing:

"Better on Balance?" Project for Attorney Retention, 2003, pages 31 - 34.

"Work-to-Life Balance in Departments and Firms," by Alea Jasmin Mitchell (Diversity and the Bar, MCCA, Sept./Oct. 2003).

Work Options.com

ShareGoals.com

 







Law Firm | Corporate Counsel | Publications | The Scoop | Up To PAR
Home | Resources | About PAR | Contact Us | Search


  Send mail to our web coordinator with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2000-2006 Cynthia Calvert