Who is using reduced hours to save costs?

PAR is aware of several U.S. law firms that are using reduced hours to save costs and jobs. While these firms would prefer not to be named, we can name the following:

Hogan & Hartson (hat tip: Above the Law 4/2/09)

UK law firm Norton Rose

KPMG Europe

University of California

George Mason University

Sigma Group

Delta Hotels Ltd.

Is your company reducing hours as an alternative to layoffs? Let us know.



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Law Firms Can Cut Costs and Save Jobs

with Balanced Hours

Download report here

SAN FRANCISCO, March 16, 2009: Layoffs aren't the only way for law firms to reduce their payrolls, according to an economic analysis of layoffs issued today by the Project for Attorney Retention (PAR). The analysis finds that balanced hours, which are reduced schedules that are designed to meet law firms' business goals, can significantly cut costs and save jobs at law firms.

PAR Co-Director Joan Williams explained, "Layoffs and flexible downsizing are two models for matching supply and demand when there is not enough work to keep everyone busy. Our analysis shows that flexible downsizing with balanced hours may save as much or more than layoffs. Flexible downsizing also helps firms retain their investment in high-performing attorneys and avoid certain legal risks."

The analysis provides an example of how balanced hours can be used to align attorneys' schedules with current workloads. It provides a hypothetical of a law firm department with six associates, each averaging $200,000 per year in salary. Cutting one associate would save the firm about $211,000, which PAR calculates by looking at the savings from salary, benefits ($60,000) and malpractice insurance ($4,000), less the cost of severance ($50,000) and outplacement services ($3,000). A balanced hours program, on the other hand, would save this same law firm department $240,000 by asking each associate to reduce his or her hours and compensation by 20%.

Using balanced hours has the added benefit of providing a means to handle fluctuating periods of workflow without demoralizing layoffs and the expensive and time consuming hiring process when business picks up. "The firm retains its high-performing attorneys that it paid dearly to recruit and train," said Cynthia Calvert, Co-Director of PAR. "These attorneys are immediately available to jump in when workloads increase."

Balanced hours differ from traditional part-time programs in that balanced hours programs have a focus on professional development and client service. The balanced hours program developed by PAR is designed as a business initiative that firms use to recruit and retain high performing attorneys, who provide superior client service because their longer tenure at their firm allows greater familiarity with client business. Key elements of balanced hour programs include the elimination of the stigma often associated with traditional part-time programs and the promotion of balanced hour associates to partner. PAR advises that firms implementing balanced hours programs as a cost-saving strategy provide strong reassurances that reducing one's hours will not result in negative career consequences.

For the complete analysis and to learn more about balanced hours,visit PAR's website. The report can be downloaded here.

The Project for Attorney Retention, a nonprofit organization that studies the advancement of women lawyers and work/life issues for all lawyers, is headquartered at UC Hastings College of the Law. Its co-directors are Joan C. Williams, distinguished professor of law at Hastings, and Cynthia Thomas Calvert, a former law firm litigation partner. This analysis was spearheaded by Linda Bray Chanow, PAR's director of research. PAR is funded by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and other grantors, and by its law department and law firm members.

# # # 

 







Law Firm | Corporate Counsel | Publications | New Models | Up To PAR

Home | Resources | About PAR | Contact Us | Search


  Send mail to our web coordinator with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2000-2009 The Center for WorkLife Law