The fact that no men work part-time may indicated that the
firm's part-time program is stigmatized and not usable.
In the past five years, the firm has not promoted to partner
any attorneys who have worked or are currently working alternative
schedules. However, the firm has promoted such attorneys in
prior years. Part-time associates may stay on the partnership
track but the length of their part-time status may affect partnership
decisions.
The firm considers requests from lawyers for part-time work
arrangements on an individual basis. Each request is reviewed
based on the reasons for the request, the terms of the request,
and the firm's needs. In general, the firm prefers part-time
arrangements for at least 80% of full-time hours, which, by
law firm standards, is hardly part-time. PAR does not consider
limiting part-time schedules in this fashion to be a best practice.
Lawyers working part-time receive proportional pay for their
work, but one associate reports that such lawyers may find themselves
without enough work to complete their hours. This may also indicate
stigma and lack of usability, as it seems to suggest bias on
the part of partners against working with part-time attorneys.
There have been some reports of cases in which 80% hours quickly
turned into 100% hours, if the lawyer was not strict about maintaining
his/her boundaries. Although non-billable hours, such as time
spent at CLE classes, are not credited towards the 80% schedule,
the firm consciously tries not to overload part-time attorneys
with non-billable work.